(UNI SPECIAL)
Charudutta Panigrahi
New Delhi, Apr 6 (UNI) In 1978, the Supreme Court of India did something that raised eyebrows and chuckles in equal measure-it declared that temples could be classified as "industries."
The ruling, in Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board v. A. Rajappa, broadened the definition of "industry" to include any systematic activity involving employer-employee relationships, profit motive or not. Suddenly, priests, cooks, flower sellers, and even the man who rings the temple bell were part of what the law could recognize as an industrial workforce.
At first glance, this sounds absurd. Temples are places of worship, not factories. Yet, scratch beneath the surface and you will find that India's temples are not just spiritual sanctuaries -they are sprawling economic ecosystems.
India has over 2 million temples, ranging from humble roadside shrines to mega-complexes like Tirupati, Shirdi, and Vaishno Devi. Collectively, they generate an estimated Rs 3.02 lakh crore annually, about USD 40 billion, a figure comparable to India's IT sector.
Direct jobs: priests, musicians, cooks, administrative staff. Indirect jobs: flower farmers, jewellers, artisans, transport operators, hoteliers, guides, and vendors of talismans and ritual items.
Studies suggest millions of Indians are directly or indirectly engaged in temple-linked activities.
Take Tirumala Tirupati as an example. The temple employs over 14,000 people directly, while supporting tens of thousands more through tourism, hospitality, and ancillary services. The ripple effect is immense: from the farmer growing coconuts to the jeweller crafting gold ornaments, the temple economy sustains livelihoods across sectors.
If temples are industries, then their supply chains look remarkably like those of modern corporations.
Upstream industries include farmers cultivating flowers, incense materials, and food grains, as well as artisans and jewellers producing idols, ornaments, and ritual paraphernalia.
The core industry is the temple itself, managing rituals, donations, festivals, and pilgrim services.
Downstream industries include vendors selling talismans, wearable religious items, and souvenirs; mutts and smaller shrines sustaining local economies; event organizers for religious festivals like the Kumbh Mela, which alone generates billions in tourism revenue, and hospitality and transport sectors thriving on pilgrim traffic.
In short, temples are not isolated spiritual centres; they are hubs around which entire micro-economies orbit.
Think about your own life. Buying flowers for puja? You are part of the temple economy. Booking a train or a flight ticket to Puri? Railways and airlines thrive on pilgrim traffic. Attending a wedding with temple rituals? Priests, jewellers, and caterers are all part of the chain. Even the pakodawala outside the temple is a stakeholder in this "industry."
Humorously put, when my mother insists on buying "two extra coconuts for good luck," she is technically boosting India's GDP.
India is not alone in this. Globally, religious economies are massive: Saudi Arabia's Hajj economy generates USD 12 billion annually, supporting airlines, hotels, and retail.
Vatican City sustains thousands of jobs through tourism linked to St. Peter's Basilica and the Vatican Museums. Japan's Shinto shrines host festivals like Gion Matsuri in Kyoto, attracting millions and blending faith with commerce.
Worldwide, religious tourism is projected to reach much over USD 260 billion by 2027. India's temple economy is very much part of this global phenomenon.
The Supreme Court's 1978 ruling was not without controversy. Critics argued that temples lack a profit motive and should not be treated as industries. Proponents countered that the sheer scale of employment and economic activity justified the classification.
The ruling also had practical implications: temple employees could claim protection under labour laws. Priests and workers were no longer just custodians of faith; they were recognized as part of an industrial workforce.
Fast forward to today, and the debate continues. Should temples be taxed like industries? Should priests be treated as employees with formal benefits? The answers are complex, balancing faith, law, and economics.
Temples are about devotion and livelihoods. They sustain millions, generate billions, and shape India's cultural and economic landscape. Recognizing them as industries may sound odd, but it forces us to acknowledge their real-world impact. In our day-to-day lives, temples are everywhere, whether in the form of a roadside shrine or a grand pilgrimage centre. They are places where spirituality meets commerce, where bells ring alongside cash registers, and where faith quietly fuels the economy.
The Supreme Court's 1978 ruling may have seemed eccentric, but it captured a truth: temples are industries in their own right. They employ millions, generate billions, and sustain entire ecosystems of upstream and downstream activities.
Whether or not we legally classify them as industries, temples undeniably shape India's economy and culture. They are reminders that faith and finance are not as separate as we might think. And perhaps, the next time you buy a garland or drop a coin in the donation box, you will smile at the thought that you are participating in one of India's most unusual and most powerful-industries.
(The writer is an author. Views are personal.)
UNI XC RSA