Paris, Aug 10 (UNI) In a significant development, the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) on Saturday extended the deadline for issuing a decision in Indian wrestler Vinesh Phogat's appeal.

The extension grants Sole Arbitrator Dr. Annabelle Bennett until 6:00 pm on August 11 to deliver her ruling on whether Phogat should be awarded a joint silver medal at the ongoing Paris Olympics.
Phogat's case reflects the complexity, which involves not only the wrestler but also the United World Wrestling (UWW) and the International Olympic Committee (IOC). The additional time is intended to allow Dr. Bennett to meticulously review the intricate details of the case, ensuring that all aspects are thoroughly considered before a final ruling is made.
Phogat's appeal has attracted widespread attention due to its potential ramifications on her career and on wrestling regulations globally. The 29-year-old wrestler had earlier announced her retirement following her performance at the Olympics. Her case has become a focal point in discussions about fair play and the integrity of Olympic competition.
Phogat, who had achieved impressive victories over top competitors, including reigning Olympic champion Yui Susaki and European champion Oksana Livach, fell just short in the final against Sarah Hildebrandt of the USA. Despite her remarkable performance, the outcome of the final left her without a medal, leading to her appeal for a joint silver medal.
In a statement reflecting the hopes of many, Phogat’s uncle expressed optimism about the outcome, saying, "I am confident that the decision will be in our favor, and the 140 crore people of India will receive good news."
The Indian Olympic Association (IOA) has expressed its belief in the merits of Phogat’s application and remains hopeful for a positive resolution.

Representing Phogat in the proceedings are senior advocates Harish Salve and Vidushpat Singhania, who have been instrumental in navigating the complex legal landscape of the appeal.
IOC President Thomas Bach has acknowledged the gravity of Phogat’s situation but has also voiced concerns about the broader implications of making concessions in similar cases. The IOC’s position highlights the delicate balance between addressing individual athlete concerns and maintaining the integrity of Olympic rules and regulations.
As the deadline approaches, all eyes will be on the CAS for its decision, which is expected to be accompanied by a reasoned order.
UNI BDN ARN GNK