About the VARIPULSE™ Platform
The VARIPULSE™ Platform is Johnson & Johnson MedTech’s Pulsed Field ablation system. The fully integrated platform includes the VARIPULSE™ Catheter, TRUPULSE™ Generator, and CARTO™ 3 Mapping System VARIPULSE™ Software.
Cardiovascular Solutions from Johnson & Johnson MedTech
Across Johnson & Johnson, we are tackling the world’s most complex and pervasive health challenges. Through a cardiovascular portfolio that provides healthcare professionals with advanced mapping and navigation, miniaturized tech, and precise ablation we are addressing conditions with significant unmet needs such as heart failure, coronary artery disease, stroke, and atrial fibrillation. We are the global leaders in heart recovery, circulatory restoration, and the treatment of heart rhythm disorders, as well as an emerging leader in neurovascular care, committed to taking on two of the leading causes of death worldwide in heart failure and stroke. For more, visit biosensewebster.com.
About Johnson & Johnson
At Johnson & Johnson, we believe health is everything. Our strength in healthcare innovation empowers us to build a world where complex diseases are prevented, treated, and cured, where treatments are smarter and less invasive, and solutions are personal. Through our expertise in Innovative Medicine and MedTech, we are uniquely positioned to innovate across the full spectrum of healthcare solutions today to deliver the breakthroughs of tomorrow and profoundly impact health for humanity. Learn more about our MedTech sector’s global scale and deep expertise in surgery, orthopaedics, vision, and cardiovascular solutions at jnjmedtech.com. Follow us at @JNJMedTech and on LinkedIn.
Cautions Concerning Forward-Looking Statements
This press release contains “forward-looking statements” as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 related to the VARIPULSETM Platform. The reader is cautioned not to rely on these forward-looking statements. These statements are based on current expectations of future events. If underlying assumptions prove inaccurate or known or unknown risks or uncertainties materialize, actual results could vary materially from the expectations and projections of Johnson & Johnson. Risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to: competition, including technological advances, new products and patents attained by competitors; uncertainty of commercial success for new products; the ability of the company to successfully execute strategic plans; impact of business combinations and divestitures; challenges to patents; changes in behavior and spending patterns or financial distress of purchasers of health care products and services; and global health care reforms and trends toward health care cost containment. A further list and descriptions of these risks, uncertainties and other factors can be found in Johnson & Johnson’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K, including in the sections captioned “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” and “Item 1A. Risk Factors,” and in Johnson & Johnson’s subsequent Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Copies of these filings are available online at www.sec.gov, www.jnj.com, www.investor.jnj.com or on request from Johnson & Johnson. Johnson & Johnson does not undertake to update any forward-looking statement as a result of new information or future events or developments.
General Disclaimer:
The VARIPULSE™ Platform is a medical device and should be used only by appropriately trained healthcare professionals in accordance with the approved indications, applicable labelling, and instructions for use in India. This press release is intended solely for informational purposes and should not be construed as medical advice, a solicitation to patients, or a substitute for the independent clinical judgment of a qualified healthcare professional. Individual patient outcomes may vary, and treatment decisions should be made by the treating physician based on the patient’s clinical condition and applicable medical guidance.
© Johnson & Johnson and its affiliates 2026. All rights reserved. [IN_ELP_THER_416974]
Johnson & Johnson Private Limited
Arena Space, Behind Majas Bus Depot, Off J.V. Link Road, Jogeshwari (East), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India, 400 060
[i] Duytschaever M, De Potter T, Grimaldi M, et al. Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Using a Novel Variable-Loop Biphasic Pulsed Field Ablation Catheter Integrated With a 3-Dimensional Mapping System: 1-Year Outcomes of the Multicenter inspIRE Study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2023;16(3):e011780. doi:10.1161/CIRCEP.122.011780 pg 4
[ii] Reddy VY, Calkins H, Mansour M, Wazni O, Di Biase L, Bahu M, Newton D, Liu CF, Sauer WH, Goyal S, Iyer V, Nair D, Athill C, Hussein A, Whalen P, Melby D, Natale A; AdmIRE Trial Investigators. Pulsed Field Ablation to Treat Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Safety and Effectiveness in the AdmIRE Pivotal Trial. Circulation. 2024 Oct 8 pg 8
[iii] Anter, E., Mansour, M., Nair, D.G. et al. Dual-energy lattice-tip ablation system for persistent atrial fibrillation: a randomized trial. Nat Med 30, 2303–2310 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-024-03022-6 pg 2
[iv] Reddy VY, Lehmann JW, Gerstenfeld EP, Mugglin AS, Schneider CW, Achyutha AB, Mansour M. A randomized controlled trial of pulsed field ablation versus standard-of-care ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: The ADVENT trial rationale and design. Heart Rhythm O2. 2023 Mar 8;4(5):317-328. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2023.03.001. PMID: 37323994; PMCID: PMC10264259. Pg 6
[v] VOLT CE Mark Study: Long-term safety and effectiveness of de novo PVI intreating AF. pg 3
[vi] Scherr D, Turagam MK, Maury P, Blaauw Y, van der Voort P, Neuzil P, et al. Repeat procedures after pulsed field ablation for atrial fibrillation: MANIFEST-REDO study. Europace. 2025;2025(1):euaf012. doi:10.1093/europace/euaf012. Pg 4 results section
[vii] Seemala SKR, Musikantow DR, Perdomo C, Malyshev Y, Ambesh P, Saleem M, et al. Pulsed field ablation (PFA) to treat atrial fibrillation and related arrhythmias: one-year outcomes of the VIRTUE trial. Poster PO-FP-006. Pg 1
[viii] Fink T, Sciacca V, Bannmann K, et al. First experience using a novel variable loop catheter for mapping and pulsed field ablation of atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2025 May;48(5):471-479. doi:10.1111/pace.15177. Epub 2025 Mar 28. PMID:40153431; PMCID:PMC12063197
[ix] Fink T, Sciacca V, Bannmann K, et al. First experience using a novel variable loop catheter for mapping and pulsed field ablation of atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2025 Mar 28. doi:10.1111/pace.15177. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 40153431.
[x] Laizzo PA. Handbook of Cardiac Anatomy, Physiology, and Devices. 2015. Springer Science+Business Media. LLC: Switzerland
[xi] Staerk L, Sherer JA, Ko D, Benjamin EJ, Helm RH. Atrial Fibrillation: Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Clinical Outcomes. Circ Res. 2017;120(9):1501-1517
[xii] Tan S, Zhou J, Veang T, Lin Q, Liu Q. Global, regional, and national burden of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter from 1990 to 2021: sex differences and global burden projections to 2046—a systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. EP Europace. 2025;27(2):euaf027. doi:10.1093/europace/euaf027
[xiii] Savarese G, Becher PM, Lund LH, Seferovic P, Rosano GMC, Coats AJSC. Global burden of heart failure: a comprehensive and updated review of epidemiology. Cardiovasc Res. 2022;118(17):3272‑3287. doi:10.1093/cvr/cvac013
[xv] Saggu DK, Sundar G, Nair SG, Bhargava VC, Lalukota K, Chennapragada S, Narasimhan C, Chugh SS. Prevalence of atrial fibrillation in an urban population in India: the Nagpur pilot study. Heart Asia. 2016 Apr 18;8(1):56-9. doi: 10.1136/heartasia-2015-010674
[xvi] Gupta R . Recent trends in coronary heart disease epidemiology in India. Indian Heart J 2008;60:B4–B18.
[xvii] Vora, A, Kapoor A, Nair M, et al. Clinical presentation, management, and outcomes in the Indian heart rhythm society-atrial fibrillation (IHRS-AF) registry. Indian Heart J, 69 (1) (2017), pp. 43-47
[xviii] Sharma YP, Batta A, Makkar K, et al.. Angiographic profile and outcomes in persistent non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a study from tertiary care center in North India. Indian Heart J, 74 (1) (2022), pp. 7-12
[xix] Dalal, J., Poncha, F., Bansal, S., Das, A., Gupta, P., Ghosh, D., … Mali, M. (2022). Expert Opinion on the Use of Novel Oral Anticoagulants for Stroke Prevention in Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation for the Primary Care Setting in India: A Literature Review. Curēus (Palo Alto, CA), 14(5), e25102–e25102. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.25102
[xx] Feigin V, Abate M, Abate Y et al.Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990–2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021 The Lancet Neurology, 23, 973-1003 Ex
[xxi]Chun KRJ, Miklavčič D, Vlachos K, Bordignon S, Scherr D, Jaïs P, Schmidt B. State-of-the-art pulsed field ablation for cardiac arrhythmias: ongoing evolution and future perspective. EP Europace. 2024;26(6):euae134. doi:10.1093/europace/euae134.
[xxii] Di Biase L, Zou F, Lin AN, et al. Feasibility of Three-Dimensional Artificial Intelligence Algorithm Integration with Intracardiac Echocardiography for
Left Atrial Imaging During Atrial Fibrillation Catheter Ablation. Europace. 2023 Aug 2;25(9):euad211.
[xxiii] Debreceni D, Janosi K, Bocz B, et al. (2023). Zero fluoroscopy catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Cardiovasc Med;10:1178783. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1178783
[xxiv] Rajendra A, Hunter TD, Morales GX, et al. (2023). Steerable sheath visualizable under 3D electroanatomical mapping facilitates paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation with minimal fluoroscopy. J Interv Card Electrophysiol;66(2):381-388. doi: 10.1007/s10840-022-01332-8.
[xxv] Tahin T, Riba A, Nemeth B, et al. (2021). Implementation of a zero fluoroscopic workflow using a simplified intracardiac echocardiography guided method for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation, including repeat procedures. BMC Cardiovasc Disord;21(1):407. doi: 10.1186/s12872-021-02219-8.
[xxvi] Grimaldi M, Quadrini F, Caporusso N, et al. Deep sedation protocol during atrial fibrillation ablation using a novel variable-loop biphasic pulsed field ablation catheter. Europace. 2023;25(9):euad222. doi:10.1093/europace/euad222. PMID: 37470452; PMCID: PMC10434733.
[xxvii] De Potter T, Grimaldi M, Duytschaever M, Anic A, Vijgen J, Neuzil P, Van Herendael H, Verma A, Skanes A, Scherr D, Pürerfellner H, Rackauskas G, Jais P, Reddy VY, et al; inspIRE Trial Investigators. Predictors of success for pulmonary vein isolation with pulsed-field ablation using a variable-loop catheter with 3D mapping integration: complete 12-month outcomes from inspIRE. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2024;17(5):e012667. doi:10.1161/CIRCEP.123.012667. Epub 2024 Apr 24. PMID: 38655693; PMCID: PMC11111320.
[xxviii] Scherr D, Bessière F, Kronborg MB, et al; VARIPURE Investigators. Effectiveness of AF pulsed field ablation with a variable loop circular catheter: 12-month VARIPURE results. Presented at: PFA Summit: European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) Congress; April 11, 2025; Paris, France.
[xxi] Porterfield C, Krishnan K, Khaykin Y, et al. Variable Loop Circular Catheter Pulsed Field Ablation in Real-World Practice: Complication Rates Across Patient and Procedural Characteristics. Presented at HRS; April 24, 2026; Chicago, IL